I’ve been studying working hours since I joined the ILO in 2000 and I’ve never seen anything like it: article after article touting the benefits of a reduced work-week, with business leaders from Google co-founder Larry Page to Mexican billionaire Carlos Slim, all saying the same thing.
If you ask me, the idea of cutting back the workweek has finally reached critical mass. But it’s hardly a new idea—there are a lot of good reasons for moving towards a shorter, four-day workweek. Here are just a few of them.
1. Working too much is bad for your health
The costs of long working hours in terms of occupational health and safety are staggering. Cardiovascular diseases, gastrointestinal and reproductive problems, musculoskeletal disorders, chronic infections, mental health problems, and even higher rates of “all-cause mortality”—in other words, death! If you don’t believe me, ask workers in Japan and Korea, where words like karoshi and kwarosa—which literally mean “death from overwork”—are part of everyday vocabulary. Moving to a four-day workweek would help to reduce these serious health issues and their associated costs.
2. A shorter workweek would create more and better jobs
While some people are working too much, others aren’t able to work enough—namely those part-time workers who would prefer full-time jobs. During the global economic crisis, policies such as Kurzarbeit in Germany encouraged companies to respond to reduced demand for their products and services by reducing working hours instead of cutting jobs. For example, instead of laying-off 20 per cent of the workforce, employers could reduce working hours for all workers by 20 per cent—from five days a week to four. Similar measures can be used in good times as well. For example, when the legal workweek in Korea was cut from 44 to 40 hours per week, there were increases in both employment and productivity.
3. We’re more productive when we work less
In many parts of the world, it’s taken as an article of faith that long working hours equal high productivity. The problem is that it simply isn’t true. On the contrary, many of those countries where workers work the longest have relatively low labour productivity. This is particularly true in work environments that encourage presenteeism, or “face time”, which is all about showing your boss how hard you are working—instead of actually doing the work. But “face time” is waste time: it doesn’t increase your productivity or improve your results. Shorter working hours, by contrast, have been shown to boost workers’ motivation, lower absenteeism, reduce the risk of mistakes and accidents, and discourage employee turnover. So cutting the workweek isn’t just good for workers, it’s good for businesses, too.
“A new study has shown that a shorter workweek was directly related to an increase in overall life satisfaction, or ‘happiness’.”
4. Working less would be good for the environment
With all the talk about “greening” our economies these days, people seldom talk about cutting work hours. Yet, it’s pretty clear that the more we work, the bigger our “carbon footprint” will be. Cutting back on the number of days that we work—and thus the number of times that we have to commute from our homes to our workplaces—is bound to save energy, reduce carbon emissions and ultimately make for a “greener” economy.
5. Working fewer days would make us happier
A number of studies have identified regular long working hours as an important predictor of work-life conflict. This may sound obvious, especially to anyone with kids or elderly parents to care for, but the facts show that long work weeks can lead to more stress and anxiety at home. In fact, a new study has shown that a shorter workweek was directly related to an increase in overall life satisfaction, or “happiness”.
Summing it all up, there are a lot of good reasons for reducing working hours and moving to a shorter workweek. If the workweek is already five days—as it is in most advanced economies—then moving to a four-day workweek doesn’t just make good sense, it is the next step in the long road to a happier, healthier, and more sustainable society.
Good points, and a timely post when the mainstream, economists’ view is still that social gains need to be rolled back rather than extended (a key item in labour submission, i.e. “labour market flexibility”). But isn’t there some contradiction between point 2 (more jobs) and point 4 (better environment)? Perhaps the answer is that point 2 is more short-term, cyclical, whereas point 4 is a longer term, underlying trend consideration. I would put point 5 closer to point 1 (related dimensions). And then there is the question of income: how is it to be maintained? But I think many would agree that in facing what might be a new rush of labour-saving technology, higher productivity for better paid workers will need to be compensated by less working time rather than by higher pay.
Hello Jon,
The article is good to read. Can you tell me, reduction of working days and hence production of more jobs – how it will affect the profitability of business ?, as I understand, this will be leading to higher operational costs. Has this disadvantage been studied with the advantage of higher productivity of individuals ? Do we have any statistics already available ?
Thanks ,
Marcus
Pretty interest, in combining with robots that can do routine job it could work. The fear is about transition period that people could lost part of incomes due to short week or lost total incomes due to massive robotization including white collars jobs.
Very interesting article. I like it. The argument related to greening the economy by working less strikes me as a point that merits real thinking as indeed, this has not been discussed much in green economy and environment circles. The ILO along with UNEP, UNIDO, UNITAR and UNDP are starting a new Academy on the Green Economy in Turin next week (6-17 October). The Academy brings some 120 goverment officials and other representaties from around the world – a good crowd of “greening folks”. I would be interested in raising this argument among Academy participants. If Mr. Messenger wishes to join such a discussion – even through video conference on Skype – we could make arrangements for it. Please let us know by contacting me (gueye@ilo.org) or the Green Jobs Coordinator (Kees van der Ree – vanderree@ilo.org). Regards, kamal
Hi, do I understand it correctly: you want 4 days work week but you want to preserve the wage? Or you also want the wage to be shorten accordingly?
Pingback: OIT propone trabajar 4 días a la semana
Pingback: ONU: La semana laboral de cuatro días es mejor que la de cinco | Lejos del tiempo
Pingback: ONU recomienda reducir jornada laboral - Mundo al Cuadrado
Here is my proposal of 4-working-day calendar:
http://calendars.wikia.com/wiki/6-Day_Week_Solar_Calendar_with_common_Muslim/Christian_weekend
Excelente la propuesta para fortalecer la familia.